In this blog, we discuss the importance of bioreactor spargers in improving gas transfer and cell culture efficiency. Understand various sparger types, designs, and selection strategies to optimize oxygen transfer, minimize contamination potential, and maximize product yield in pharmaceutical, biofuel, and biomanufacturing processes.
If you are looking for more details, kindly visit JINTAI.
From scaling fermentation to cell or protein stability, find actionable insights to optimize and maintain your bioprocess to deliver consistent, high-quality outcomes.
The gas sparger system is a critical component used in bioreactors, including those that use aerobic microbes and algae, to introduce gases like oxygen or carbon dioxide into the liquid culture medium of the bioreactor. As such, it provides uniform dispersion of gas, thus enhancing the efficiency of mass transfer in the system while keeping the optimal metabolic environment for the cell or microorganism.
Spargers increase dissolved oxygen that is essential for aerobic fermentation processes by producing fine bubbles or streams of gas. Their design has direct implications for cell growth rates, product yields, and overall process consistency in industries including pharmaceuticals, biofuels, and biomanufacturing.
Different types of spargers are designed for particular bioprocessing applications:
These balance gas transfer effectiveness, foam suppression, and biological system compatibility, with the porous variants dominating ~45% of commercial bioprocessing setups due to their versatility.
Spargers provide a uniform distribution of oxygen and other gases that are vital to cellular metabolism that ultimately directly impact biomass productivity. In the aerobic part, reducing the oxygen supply can decrease the cell viability up to 60% and the optimized sparging maintains dissolved oxygen above 20% saturation.
Mammalian cell cultures are especially sensitive to O2, with critical levels of O2 needed at specific time points (10–20 mmol/L/h delivered with spargers) to prevent oxidative stress damage, while microbial fermentations depend on spargers to maintain exponential growth phases, yielding over 109 cells/mL in industrial scale fermenters.
Good sparger design increases gas–liquid mass transfer rates (expressed as volumetric mass transfer coefficients (kLa)). In fact, kLa values of microporous spargers are between 150–200 h-1, as opposed to the 50–80 h-1 of coarse bubble systems. This efficient process minimizes the buildup of CO2, which, if left unmanaged, can suppress enzyme activity by 30–40%.
In high volume bioreactors (>10,000 L), ring spargers with 0.2–0.5 mm pores have boosted O2 utilization by 25% translating to increases in product titers, such as for monoclonal antibodies.
Material choice directly affects sparger compatibility, durability, resistance, and contamination risks. 316L stainless steel is generally widely employed for high-pressure sterilization and in corrosive environments, so it is accounted for more than 75% of industrial bioreactors.
For single-use systems, polymers such as PTFE or silicone are favored since they are chemically inert, mitigating leachable risk by as much as 90%. Ceramic spargers (although less common) perform extremely well in high-temperature processes, boasting 3-5x longer life in abrasive media.
If you want to learn more, please visit our website sparger ring.
Gas-liquid mixing and energy consumption are directly correlated with pressure drop across spargers. Thus, 30-50% pressure drop increment should result in 15-20% lower oxygen transfer efficiency in microbubble generators.
For instance, optimized designs with uniform pore distribution achieve 25-40% lower pressure gradients than irregular patterns. Systems above 2 bar often require special reinforced materials to prevent structural deformation.
Choosing the right sparger involves considering parameters like gas-liquid transfer efficiency, shear stress sensitivity of the organisms and scalability, etc. This distribution of the bubble sizes directly affects the oxygen transfer rates (OTR), a very crucial factor for processes that are dependent on aerobic reactions.
In addition, the materials utilized with regard to process fluids (e.g., whether or not all components are stainless for corrosive media or silicone for gentle aeration) and sterilization methods (autoclave versus CIP/SIP) need to correlate with the operational requirements. Also think about sparger placement and mixing dynamics to prevent dead zones or foam formation.
Standard spargers for use in common applications, such as microbial fermentation are low-cost and commercially available. Examples of custom designs include designs that minimize shear in cell cultures or handle more viscous broths. Niche bioprocesses may benefit from hybrid multi-orifice configurations or running mixtures of sintered metals and PTFE coatings.
Although custom solutions may add lead time and cost, they increase process yield for sensitive applications, such as mammalian cell bioreactors.
Microporous spargers in vaccine manufacturing reduced foaming by 40% versus open-pipe designs. Likewise, an adjustable ring sparger used by a brewery resulted in stable yeast viability being achieved with dissolved oxygen held within ±5% variability.
Cleaning is paramount to achieving optimal operation of a sparger and avoiding contamination. Eighty percent (80%) of industrial bioreactors use high-velocity fluids as part of automated Clean-in-Place (CIP) systems for biofilm and particulate removal (Fig. 1). If there are stubborn residues, mechanical cleaning with ultrasonic baths or soft brushes is recommended.
Soaking in a 0.1–1.0 M NaOH solution removes organic deposits, while mineral deposits are treated with nitric acid (2–5% concentration). Ensure residuals are less than 0.1 ppm by verifying cleanliness post-cleaning using ATP swab tests or conductivity measurements.
Strained gas exchange rates of up to 40% less due to cellular debris or precipitates can be addressed via increasing backflush frequency or inline filters (5–10 µm pore size).
In 15–20% of cases, uneven gas distribution is observed—this can occur because pressure sensors have not been calibrated, and/or sparger membranes have not been replaced when damaged. Temperature control and addition of reagents can work around this issue as well.
For example, material degradation (e.g., silicone or stainless steel corrosion) can be reduced by chemical compatibility in material choice, as well as bi-annual integrity tests. To prevent foaming, agitation speed should be decreased, and antifoam agents can be added (0.01–0.1% v/v).
If you are looking for more details, kindly visit sintered stainless steel sparger.