An ESP system comprises several major components (Figure 1). The pump is a multistage centrifugal type wherein most surfaces are directly exposed to production fluids. The focus of this article is primarily on the pump’s radial bearings and, to a lesser degree, the mechanical seal in the seal chamber section and other bearings in the components.
With competitive price and timely delivery, Zmdy Ceramics sincerely hope to be your supplier and partner.
Most oil wells require artificial lift at some point to enhance production. As an oil well matures, it is not unusual for it to produce increasing amounts of water, abrasive solids, and gas. Shale oil wells produce these materials as well, sometimes immediately. ESP systems are ideal for lifting large volumes, but abrasive solids and gas pose major challenges for these types of pumps.
Abrasive solids in the pump or intake may introduce a three-body wear process. This type of wear is frequently referred to as abrasion and is defined as the removal of material by particles sliding, rolling, or crushing between two surfaces, as illustrated in Figure 2, or by particles embedded in one surface sliding against a second surface.1 This type of wear most frequently affects the pump’s radial bearings, impeller-diffuser seal areas, and thrust Bearings.2
When a pump’s radial bearings wear, the resulting increased clearance between the sliding bearing surfaces causes increasing shaft instability (whipping), which can compromise the mechanical seal in the seal chamber section and allow wellbore fluids into the motor to cause an electrical failure. This shaft instability also stresses the motor bearings.
Recognising the importance of bearing systems for long run-life and reliability, the ESP industry has responded with design and material improvements. In particular, manufacturers have implemented different bearing approaches; the biggest step-change has been the incorporation of technical ceramics and cermet (ceramic/ metal composite) materials such as tungsten carbide.
An ESP’s radial bearing system consists of a sleeve that is keyed to a rotating shaft that is positioned inside a bushing held in a housing or diffuser bore. Two main styles of bushings are generally used. The compliant style typically incorporates O-rings between the outside diameter of the bushing and the housing or diffuser bore, and they have some means to retain them in the bore. The O-rings serve to minimize rotation, vibrations, and stresses, as well as compensate for thermal expansion and allow proper alignment.3 Figure 3 illustrates this concept.
Another style of bushing design uses an interference fit between the bushing and the housing or diffuser bore. The interference can be created by pressing the parts together or heating the housing or diffuser so the bore expands, enabling the cooler bushing to be placed in the diffuser. However, this design has a limitation in that the bushing can migrate out of the diffuser.4
The pump’s shaft sleeves are keyed to the rotating shaft and spin inside the bushing. There are two styles of keyed sleeves. The first style is a simple cylinder with an inner diameter keyway, while the other has a flanged end that imparts the axial forces from the impeller to the thrust bearing in the seal chamber section. Figure 4 illustrates both designs.
Another design approach removes the keyway in the sleeve.3 This design removes the stress concentration created by the keyway. Some manufacturers use different materials for the sleeve and bushing to leverage the strengths of each. For example, common sleeve and bushings combinations include a zirconia sleeve and bushing, a silicon carbide sleeve and a zirconia bushing, a silicon carbide sleeve and bushing, a tungsten carbide sleeve and a zirconia bushing, and a tungsten carbide sleeve and bushing.
Standard ESP pumps use two radial bearings: one in the head and one in the base. For wells that produce abrasive solids that lead to bearing wear and shaft instability, manufacturers started increasing the number of radial bearings to reduce the unsupported shaft span. This design advancement has shown that increasing shaft stability extends the mechanical reliability. As a result, some manufacturers place a radial bearing in every stage for increased run-life.3
Technical ceramics and cermets are inorganic solids that are very hard and strong in compression, which makes them ideal materials for ESP radial bearing systems. The technical ceramics commonly used in these radial bearing systems are zirconia and silicon carbide, while tungsten carbides are the typical cermets.5
An important factor in selecting a bearing design and associated materials is price. In general, zirconia is priced lower than silicon carbide or tungsten carbide. The price of tungsten carbide fluctuates based on global supply and demand factors (e.g. for cobalt and nickel binders that are also used in electric vehicles batteries), so the relative price difference between silicon carbide and tungsten carbide varies with other factors.
Friedrich Mohs developed a scale that shows hardness of minerals and it is shown in Figure 5 compared against a vertical scale for Knoop hardness. Figure 5 shows that bearing materials are harder than produced oil well solids, as well as the metal components used in ESP systems. In most cases, softer materials do not wear harder materials. However, ESP radial bearings are an exception because solids are present and cause a complex grinding abrasion. Several factors determine the rate of material removal: hardness of the bearing and particle material, ductility of the surface, and the size, shape, and toughness of the particle.1
Therefore, in the case of ESP pumps bearings with grinding abrasion occurring, both the harder and softer materials experience wear. Nevertheless, harder materials have demonstrated improved wear resistance.
Silica sand (quartz) is commonly used as a proppant to increase conductivity. Though its hardness varies, it is likely the hardest material found in production fluids. Its varying hardness is shown in Figure 5 on the high side of its hardness range.
Selected material properties are shown in Table 1.
The hardness measurement tests noted in Table 1 are different, but the values are comparable. As can be seen, the hardness of common bearing materials is much greater than steel: silicon carbide is the hardest, followed by tungsten carbide and then zirconia.
The low fracture toughness of technical ceramics and cermets introduces special design considerations. The two bushing designs mentioned previously somewhat compensate for low fracture toughness. In the compliant design, the component is held with shock-dampening O-ring(s), while the interference fit design puts the part in compression and thereby increases its resistance to cracking.
For some components, such as shaft sleeves and motor rotor bearings, compensatory design changes are not possible. In these cases, it is necessary to avoid sudden and large impacts of the components and assemblies. One manufacturer developed special shipping boxes with added rigidity and foam cradles, as well as shock tags and digital shock loggers, to minimise and monitor shock loads.6
Zirconia is almost two times tougher than tungsten carbide and nearly three times tougher than silicon carbide. As a result, it is much more resistant to shock or impact, which is desirable in an oil tool application. Therefore, when the hardness of zirconia is adequate for abrasion wear, it has a reduced risk of damage resulting from handling.
Thermal shock resistance is also high for the technical ceramics, which maintain their strength with rapid temperature changes of 300°C and higher. For the values shown in Table 1, the test was run by quenching samples into water from various elevated temperatures. The change in temperature, where a sharp decrease in flexural strength is observed, is listed as the Delta Tc, or temperature change.
Want more information on Zirconia Pump? Feel free to contact us.
Zirconia has a coefficient of thermal expansion close to steel, so if the shaft outer diameter or bushing bore size changes with temperature, the zirconia sleeve and bushing will substantially change with it. However, tungsten carbide and silicon carbide have lower coefficients of thermal expansion. With these materials, the sleeve may crack if the shaft size increases with temperature, or the bushing may become loose from the bushing bore and migrate out, as mentioned previously. Therefore, when other properties are adequate, zirconia reduces application concerns caused by coefficient of thermal expansion mismatches.
Zirconia is highly thermally insulating, whereas silicon carbide is highly thermally conductive. In other words, zirconia limits the heat transfer to metal components, and silicon carbide and tungsten carbide quickly transfer heat (even faster than steel).
It is not certain which is the more desirable property: thermally conductive or insulating. In normal pump operations it is unlikely to make a significant impact on performance, though zirconia may be preferred to insulate the heat generated at the sliding bearing surfaces from the metal components. However, in cases of gas slugging, it may be desirable to quickly remove heat generated at the unlubricated sliding bearing surfaces. In these cases, a carbide may be preferred.
Technical ceramics are inorganic non-metallic solids with high levels of chemical stability. As a result, they are extremely resistant to chemical corrosion. For the chemicals typically injected or produced in an oil well, zirconia and silicon carbide are chemically inert. However, the cermet tungsten carbides are susceptible to corrosion because the binder material can be leached out; a cobalt binder is more susceptible to corrosion than a nickel binder, especially with acids.
A common wear test for hardface materials such as technical ceramics is a pressure velocity (P-V) test. P-V values are determined in a sliding contact test using a rotating ring on a washer and varying rotational speed and applied loads. For hardface material applications without abrasive solids, P-V values are used to predict wear and service life. The presence of abrasive solids introduces other wear factors, but P-V values are indicators of relative performance.
Figure 6 compares the P-V values for different hardface combinations using tap water. SiC, shown in the image, is an acronym for silicon carbide and TC stands for tungsten carbide. SiC1, SiC2, SiC3, and SiC4 are different grades of silicon carbide. Note that the Series 2 value for tungsten carbide is less than half of the Series 8 value for the third grade of silicon carbide (SiC3). It should be noted that surface finish differences in Series 5 and 6 had a minimal influence. The figure illustrates that not all silicon carbide grades are equal with respect to wear and, depending on the grade, wear for silicon carbide can be similar or significantly different than tungsten carbide.
Technical ceramics and cermets also provide beneficial properties for additional components in ESPs, including the radial bearings in the intake, the mechanical face seals and thrust bearings in the seal chamber section, and the motor thrust bearings and rotor bearings. Several materials are used in these applications, but the most common are silicon carbide and tungsten carbide due to their wear resistance.
Other factors aside, an ESP system will eventually fail from vibration caused by radial instability brought about by abrasive wear.2 Some oil producers want ESP systems with a 10-year run life7 that are ultra-reliable.8 However, not all oil producers need an ESP system with such a long life – or are willing to pay for it. For example, an ESP system for a Permian unconventional well, where it may be replaced in 15 months with a different lift system, should have an optimal bearing design, material selection, and configuration. In contrast, the optimal bearing system for a North Sea well needing a six-year run life will likely be different.
Selecting the right bearing system can reduce the total cost of operations and simultaneously reduce the environmental impact by minimising power needs, preventing unplanned maintenance/repairs, and decreasing their associated waste streams. In addition, new materials are under development with potentially better abrasion resistance than current materials, so one should not accept the status quo – especially since ESP bearing systems play an important role in enabling safe, clean, and affordable energy.
Note: The figures are generalised information and for illustrative purposes only. The charts are intended to illustrate typical properties. Property values vary with method of manufacture, size, shape of part, and test method. Data contained herein is not to be construed as absolute and does not constitute a representation or warranty for which CoorsTek assumes legal responsibility.
Zirconia alumina is a thermal spray coating material that combines aluminum oxide and zirconium oxide. In addition, it is part of AZ composites which are one of the common types of composite ceramics. At A&A Coatings, we have a wide portfolio of materials and are experienced in performing an array of thermal spray coating procedures. If you wish to learn more about the material zirconia alumina before using them on your critical parts, you have come to the right place.
For starters, a great array of professionals recognized the material as a sand blasting medium. Next, its mechanical properties allow it to be used in structural applications, e.g., cutting tools, and in many medical applications. What’s more, the material features exceptional wear resistance, hardness, elasticity, fracture toughness, and high strength.
For starters, zirconia alumina displays excellent composite strength and typically comprises alumina with a 10 to 20 per cent zirconia concentration. The latter is needed to enhance the strength of the alumina. Materials engineers increase the material’s strength by subjecting it to a stress induced transformation toughening process.
The process is designed to cause the zirconia structure to crack and allow these particles to switch phases. Next, the phase switch increases the amount of zirconia particles in the composite and creates stress areas within the alumina’s structure as well. Don’t worry as these stresses will heal the crack and prevent further cracking.
The next most notable property of the material is its good thermal traits. That’s why you will find that it can withstand high temperature applications, experiencing little to none degradation. With that in mind, the material also has very good wear resistance, corrosion resistance, and mechanical properties. This property becomes more noticeable when it is compared with conventional alumina.
Thanks to zirconia alumina having a diverse range of properties, the material can be utilized in a great array of applications as well. Let’s begin with load-bearing applications. Its corrosion resistant and high-strength properties allow it to bear heavy loads without succumbing to the effects of degradation.
Remember we mentioned using zirconia alumina to manufacture cutting tools? Yes, it is possible through grinding and sintering. The grinding process holds great importance as it determines the surface characteristics of the blade.
If you are planning to coats parts which are used in the medical industry, choosing this material is also the right choice. It can serve as a ceramic that is often needed in joint replacement and rehabilitation. Because of its high wear resistance, it can be used to create high performance implants.
Other applications of zirconia alumina? Abrasive applications, e.g., sandblasting, and because of its corrosion resistant attributes, the following items can also be created from the same material:
Call or us today to find out more about using zirconia alumina for your coatings!
Are you interested in learning more about 3 Mm Zirconia Rod? Contact us today to secure an expert consultation!